|
|
Whisky Forum
|
FAQ Search Memberlist
Register
Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
lincoln imp Master Of Malts

Joined: 23 Dec 2007 Posts: 751 Location: Lincolnshire England
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:12 pm Post subject: Bushmill's Black Bush 2021 40% V 1970's 70 proof |
|
|
I said on another forum recently that Highland Park 12 year was what first got me into whiskey properly but I was forgetting about my formative early drinking days and Bushmills Black Bush. I remember it was my go to drink when I had had enough of pint after pint of beer, and I really liked it.
This H2H pits a 2021 Black Bush against a 1970's offering, they are both good but so different, with few similarities.
Bushmills Black bush 2021 40%
V
Bushmills -Special Old Irish Whiskey Old Bushmills 70 proof 1970’s
Colour
The older 70 proof is a shade darker than the 2021
Nose
2021
I like the nose on this, there is a slight smoke note mixing with the vanilla and there is a slight chemical edge to it, not unpleasant, but it is there.
Pear, a little green apple and it is slightly vegetal
70 proof
Masses of OBE, this smells totally different and in no way related to the 2021, not even distantly?
There is a bucket load of stewed fruit, apple, plum, a little peach, mango, pear but also hints of a garage workshop, petrol fumes, not so much peaty just dirty, there could be a little sulphur here.
I am really curious here, this could be great or utterly flawed?
Palate
2021
Creamy, zingy & zesty, with lemon sherbet, a little raspberry, green apple, the initial hit of flavours is really nice.
Little ripe gooseberry comes in and faint hints of rhubarb juice, this is like a fruit cocktail, really good.
70 proof
The liquid is more resinous than the 2021, fatter on the palate, with a little peat and truckloads of spice.
There is some vanilla, brioche but again this dirty note that makes it very interesting, possibly some cigar smoke in here, very pleasant indeed.
White pepper, faintest hint of menthol, no sulphur, stewed plum, green gooseberry, a little fig, lovely
Finish
2021
At first I thought this was a little short but actually is fades gradually, it is not overly sweet, not a massive finish but long enough
70 proof
Longer than the 2021, keeps you interested, no rough edges.
Conclusion
2021 - 90/90/88 - 89 average
1970's - 92/92/90 - 91 average
They are like chalk and and cheese, there is more to the 70 proof, it reeks of age and it has a dirty, gritty edge, almost industrial in taste and smell, not for everyone but it is one of the most different tastes I have had for many a year, almost odd, almost an off note of stewed in ripe fruit but that adds to the appeal for me.
The latest Black Bush 2021 is fresh, clean and zesty and again I really like it and in my view worth a much higher score than the average on this page.
BB is supposed to be 80% malt, both bourbon and oloroso but the latest version did not taste like that and not sure if the old one did either.
I think some people would say the old 70 proof had an off note but I think that adds to the charm, like nothing else I have tasted.
There are very few 70 proof at any auctions most of the oldest are from the 1980's and I am not interested in paying silly prices but I will definitely get a the latest Black Bush, much better than some single malts in the £25-£30 bracket _________________ Pour me a glass please. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|

|
 |
ralfy legend Master Of Malts

Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Posts: 965 Location: Fife
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2021 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lincoln you are on a good roll, not tried the old bush but totally enjoyed the recent black bush, I bought a litre 7 months back and its always good to go for a good double from time to time, another interesting read on your thoughts, keep up the good work . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lincoln imp Master Of Malts

Joined: 23 Dec 2007 Posts: 751 Location: Lincolnshire England
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2021 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ralfy legend wrote: | | Lincoln you are on a good roll, not tried the old bush but totally enjoyed the recent black bush, I bought a litre 7 months back and its always good to go for a good double from time to time, another interesting read on your thoughts, keep up the good work . |
Thanks ralfy, yes I will get a bottle soon of black bush, much better than I was expecting and so much better than the white label original, worth the extra money in my view, _________________ Pour me a glass please. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MattS Master Of Malts

Joined: 23 Apr 2018 Posts: 529
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2021 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I need to have more BB having only had a small taste. From memory I preferred it over the 10. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lincoln imp Master Of Malts

Joined: 23 Dec 2007 Posts: 751 Location: Lincolnshire England
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2021 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| MattS wrote: | | I need to have more BB having only had a small taste. From memory I preferred it over the 10. |
I always thought the 10 was a bit lacklustre but the main problem is a chemical note I found in some batches, I agree the BB is a better bet. _________________ Pour me a glass please. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Graeme H Master Of Malts

Joined: 26 Jan 2017 Posts: 665 Location: A Scot in Florida
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2021 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I was never taken by the Bushmills 10 or 16 single malts, but i have always thought that they turn out some decent blends such as Bushmills Oriiginal and Blacjk Bush. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|

|
 |
ralfy legend Master Of Malts

Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Posts: 965 Location: Fife
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2021 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I’ve enjoyed some good nights on the 10 and personally I’d take it everyday over the original |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|