| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Desafinado Member

Joined: 03 Jan 2016 Posts: 10 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:19 pm Post subject: Diminishing Returns |
|
|
Since getting into liquor of all types I've started to notice how I get diminishing returns as I move up the price scale.
My most experimented tipple is Single Malt Scotch, and I've had some pretty stunning whiskies in and around the 80-110 Canadian range, however I usually don't find whiskies at this price point so good that they're worth paying the difference to drink more regularly, and at a certain point just aren't worth it at all.
On the other hand I have a few bourbon go-to's that hover around 30-45 dollars a bottle, are a nice drink, and which I really don't mind downing 3-4 glasses of in a sitting. When I drink, if I'm honest, that's what I want, and not some over-priced drink that's marginally better.
So a few questions for others:
1) Do you find a sweet spot with Scotch where you find you're getting good value?
2) At what point does the price point become less about quality, and more about status? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|

|
 |
opelfruit Master Of Malts

Joined: 19 Feb 2013 Posts: 1900 Location: Trapped inside this octavarium
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm with you on this one.
I find my sweet spot at around £60. There are many good whiskies under this price point in the UK (and I mean, many seriously good ones).
Once you get over this I find I'm paying £10-20 more for some whiskies that are only as good as ones at around £60 and once you get over £100 a bottle....well, mainly you're paying for"exclusivity" or a certain age. I've had some bottles over (well over) £100 that were stunning, but I've had many more under this price that were equally as good.
.....I suppose more accurately it's a measure of disappointment levels rather than enjoyment levels; I've been more disappointed with purchases over £100 than I have been with bottles under £100, and rarely do I find myself disappointed with purchases under £60.
So for me I guess it's about value for money. I'll go up to £60 for my daily drinkers, up to £100 for those bottles that I really just want to have and very rarely do I go over £100 any more as I don't feel I'm getting any more value from those expensive bottles (in terms of the experience to me) than I do from cheaper ones... _________________ "Too much of anything is bad, but too much good whisky is barely enough." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James T Master Of Malts

Joined: 05 Feb 2011 Posts: 2966
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| There are quite a few exceptions but I would say in general Scotch malt whisky peaks at around 18 to 21 years give or take a few years, above that you will be paying more for the rarity of the whisky rather than additional quality. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Keith Master Of Malts


Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 1531 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| James T wrote: | | There are quite a few exceptions but I would say in general Scotch malt whisky peaks at around 18 to 21 years give or take a few years, above that you will be paying more for the rarity of the whisky rather than additional quality. | Very much agree with what you say James. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samson Master Of Malts


Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 1718 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I would say quality/price varies from distillery to distillery and this will also be affected by your own personal taste. I recommend Jim Murrays Whisky Bible or Williams reviews on here when choosing a whisky, I honestly can say whatever they have declared as very good has been very good. Tastes vary but a high score on any whisky from Jim or William will usually mean you will be buying a good whisky. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|