| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
whisky_rob Master Of Malts

Joined: 13 Jan 2013 Posts: 391 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
|
Posted: Thu May 21, 2015 7:03 pm Post subject: Benromach 5 year old |
|
|
In these times of NAS on the equivalent bottlings from other distilleries I find this massively refreshing that Benromach have been open and honest with their customers when they could of gone down the NAS route with this 5yo bottling.
Tried a sample of this today and It's actually really nice and fresh, yes it doesn't taste old but I must admit that my previous misgivings about just discounting whisky this young as not worth £25 was wrong.
I don't wish to reopen the NAS debate only that I wish more distilleries would just say what the age of the liquid is.
Has anybody else really enjoyed young age statement whiskies? Kilchoman springs to mind for me as I have also enjoyed their younger stuff! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
opelfruit Master Of Malts

Joined: 19 Feb 2013 Posts: 1900 Location: Trapped inside this octavarium
|
Posted: Thu May 21, 2015 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here here!! Yes good on them. 5 years being the youngest of course so there could be some other stuff in there too.
This is what you get when you have a small, passionately run distillery that listens to is consumers and try to give them what they want. I'll buy one out of respect, for that price.
Yes Kilchoman. Also St George (English Whisky Company), they don't necessarily state ages on the bottle but they state on their website how old their whisky is.....Most of it is young. They are very tansparrent about the age and cask makeup of their stuff and take care to deliver a quality product at a good price, reminds me a lot of Benromach and I think these distilleries should be recognised and publicly applauded. _________________ "Too much of anything is bad, but too much good whisky is barely enough." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andy M Master Of Malts

Joined: 09 Jul 2007 Posts: 1212
|
Posted: Thu May 21, 2015 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Did the Benromach 5 year old replace the Benromach Traditional, if so i am sure it will be good.
Young peaty whisky, whether a lot of peat or a little works for me also young sherried whisky can work well if it is from a decent sherry cask.
I am a big fan of Kilchomans stuff and the young Port Charlotte whiskies have been good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sorren Master Of Malts


Joined: 11 Jan 2010 Posts: 2329 Location: uk
|
Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Young whisky can be great, its all about the cask, it's a shame people have the impression it has to be over 10 to be any good, I know us " geeks " know better, I too applaud the distilleries for releasing it when it's ready no matter what age... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darwin Double Malt Member


Joined: 12 Mar 2015 Posts: 135 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't care about the age as long as the product is quality and worth the price. All companies should be open and honest about their products. Otherwise one might think they want to hide something ..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diademo Master Of Malts

Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 1255
|
Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wood management is becoming increasingly important for producers. Younger whiskies are now better matured, with more predominant wood flavours and more opportunity to introduce them to the new whisky drinkers.
I'm surprise about their quality in the last few years and now I'm buying more younger vintages than ever before (but not NAS). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
TheWM Master Of Malts

Joined: 26 Nov 2012 Posts: 2037 Location: Cheshire
|
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diademo wrote: | Wood management is becoming increasingly important for producers. Younger whiskies are now better matured, with more predominant wood flavours and more opportunity to introduce them to the new whisky drinkers.
I'm surprise about their quality in the last few years and now I'm buying more younger vintages than ever before (but not NAS). |
This is an excellent point. When I visited the EWC they made a point of this given their relatively low output they could not afford to lose any to poor cask issues.
I too am surprised by some of the quality and too will be buying some of this soon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|