www.scotchmaltwhisky.co.uk

Whisky Forum - Head-to-head comp. bet. Glenmorangie 10 & Ballantine's

 

Whisky Forum

FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in
Head-to-head comp. bet. Glenmorangie 10 & Ballantine's

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Whisky Forum Index -> Whisky Tasting Notes
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Quaich1
Master Of Malts
Master Of Malts


Joined: 21 Apr 2012
Posts: 5749
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostPosted: Fri Aug 02, 2013 8:05 pm    Post subject: Head-to-head comp. bet. Glenmorangie 10 & Ballantine's Reply with quote

I've wanted to do this test comparison for some time. Here we have a single malt, Glenmorangie The Original 10 Year versus Balantine's 17 Year, a blended Scotch.

Let me give you my taste notes first from today followed by comparison of the two in terms of my own rating.

Glenmorangie 10

Neat-
Nose:Honey, fruit, sweet, citrus, orange peel and lichee nuts in syrup.
Palate: Smooth, fruity, syrup, hint of molasses and spice.
Finish: Lingering, spice, coffee, drying.

Ballantine's 17
Neat-

Nose: Ripe cantaloup, pungent, mild prune nectar, stone fruit (plum and apricot) and a hint of sweet peat smoke.
Palate: Creamy, spice, dark plums, grape jelly and an earthy note.
Finish: Long, fruit wood, mouth-watering and oak notes.

I have to say that the blended scotch, Ballantine's 17 leaves a better impression overall for me than the single malt, Glenmorangie The Original 10 Year. The Ballantine's provides a more mature nose and taste profile with heightened complexity than the latter which though quite pleasant doesn't have the depth or complexity and subtle flavor nuances of this blended scotch. I think age is everything here.

It is interesting that in this case the blended scotch is $20 more here in Ontario than the single malt. My vote goes to Ballantine's 17 in this head-to-head contest.
_________________
"Always carry a large flagon of whisky in case of snakebite and furthermore always carry a small snake."
W.C. Fields (1880-1946)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

chrisg
Double Malt Member
Double Malt Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 197

PostPosted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 10:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Havent tried them both head to head but i do like both, the Glenmorangie 10 is one of the best entry level malts from any distillery and holds in own in more expensive company and the Ballantines 17 is superb. I guess it would depend on my mood which one i would reach for, both are different and both are excellent drams.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Charlie
Master Of Malts
Master Of Malts


Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Posts: 1413

PostPosted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to say if i was to make a choice between the 2 my preference would be the Ballantines 17
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Newkophile
Single Malt Member
Single Malt Member


Joined: 01 Sep 2013
Posts: 22
Location: Boynton Beach, Florida

PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 2:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here in southeast Florida, the Ballantine's 17 is not readily available, however I did spot it in one small liquor store priced at $87. All the Total Wine & Liquors down here price the Glenmorangie 10 at $33. I cannot imagine anyone in these parts indulging in a comparison of the far less expensive single malt to the exorbitantly priced blend.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Quaich1
Master Of Malts
Master Of Malts


Joined: 21 Apr 2012
Posts: 5749
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Newkophile wrote:
Here in southeast Florida, the Ballantine's 17 is not readily available, however I did spot it in one small liquor store priced at $87. All the Total Wine & Liquors down here price the Glenmorangie 10 at $33. I cannot imagine anyone in these parts indulging in a comparison of the far less expensive single malt to the exorbitantly priced blend.


The Glenmorangie in Ontario here is $70.00 so consider yourself lucky to obtain it for less than half the Canadian price. Further to comparisons, blends vs. single malts and price, I have found that price of a bottle often correlates with quality of a dram but not always. As far as the Glenmorangie The Original is concerned, I think it is a bargain for the price whether here or the USA. I think the comparison in this case of these 2 drams is an excellent one because it shows that a blend can outshine a single malt on occasion yet the Glenmorangie The Orignal is known as a consistent light and refreshing and a memorable dram though I would consider it a starter single malt. The satisfaction obtained from a dram is not based on what someone else thinks or writes about it but rather what ones's own taste buds dictate. Having said that I much prefer the Quinta Ruban and Nectar D'or to the The Original and The Lasanta does have a sulphur issue so here's a good example of price and taste not necessarily correlating even within these 4 Glenmorangies. For those who reflect on the pundits, Jim Murray bashes the Lasanta as basically a sulphur cocktail. In any event, that's my opinion on the broader as well as the more specific issues which are precipitated by your comment..

Cheers. Wink
_________________
"Always carry a large flagon of whisky in case of snakebite and furthermore always carry a small snake."
W.C. Fields (1880-1946)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Newkophile
Single Malt Member
Single Malt Member


Joined: 01 Sep 2013
Posts: 22
Location: Boynton Beach, Florida

PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Point taken, however I do like equally the Glenmorangie Lasanta and Quinta Ruban, both priced at $46 here at the TW&Ls scattered throughout southeast Florida. (I did not detect any sulphur issue with the Lasanta). I admit to never having tried the Glenmorangie Original 10 because I tend to spend my liquor dollars on spirits that have at least 43% ABV. As Ralfy says, and I do heartily agree, taste and alcohol content DO correlate. While I have never tried the Ballantine 17 due to its high price down here (see my above post), I have tried the Ballantine 12 (priced at a mere $23 here but only 40% ABV)) and found it quite acceptable for what it is, a go-to blend that can be sipped comfortably and also readily used as a mixer for guests.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Whisky Forum Index -> Whisky Tasting Notes All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 Drink Safely   Add Your Site   Other Whisky Sites    Links   Contact Us 

 

© 2026 www.scotchmaltwhisky.co.uk All rights reserved.

This website was produced in Scotland.