View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ralfy legend Master Of Malts

Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Posts: 964 Location: Fife
|
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:31 am Post subject: Whisky to bourbon question |
|
|
Been drinking whisky for five years now and apart from a few disappointments I've totally enjoyed the journey, I'm not bored but the question I'm asking is , when going in a new direction say bourbon is it easy cross over? I've tried buffalo trace and didn't have anythink bad to say and ive tried woodford reserve that I really enjoyed, I know there's better out there but do I stick with my journey or venture into boubon for a year? If I go into another direction I don't tend to turn back quickly. A few recommendations would also help. Many thanks RL. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
cdn_dram Triple Malt Member

Joined: 09 Sep 2016 Posts: 211 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
My favorites are woodford reserve double oaked and pikesville 100%rye. Both very complex.
Four roses SB, Blanton's or Blanton's gold are some great options too and are a bit more typical bourbons.
Last edited by cdn_dram on Wed Dec 13, 2017 1:49 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Samson Master Of Malts


Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 1712 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I do enjoy bourbon to a certain extent, the intensity from the new oak can be impressive but I do prefer the refinement of Scotch single malt whisky. There is certainly some good bourbons, and often cheaper than Scotch but I feel they are all very similar to a certain extent, good for when the mood takes me but I am Scotch single malt man. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big Mac Master Of Malts

Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Posts: 2202 Location: USA - Formerly Scotland
|
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Samson wrote: | I do enjoy bourbon to a certain extent, the intensity from the new oak can be impressive but I do prefer the refinement of Scotch single malt whisky. There is certainly some good bourbons, and often cheaper than Scotch but I feel they are all very similar to a certain extent, good for when the mood takes me but I am Scotch single malt man. | Ditto as they say |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
davidbe Master Of Malts

Joined: 28 May 2015 Posts: 499
|
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Buffalo Trace isn't a bad start but in Europe it's lost a bit of bite due to being 40% unlike the US 45% bottle.
I would recommend the following:
Eagle Rare (Sweet, oaky)
Evan Williams Single Barrel (nutty, a bit thin, slight bitter but complex)
Elijah Craig Small Batch (or the 12 year old) - Heavily oaky but well balanced. If you're feeling adventurous try the barrel proof (but import from europe, much cheaper than UK).
Any of the Jim Beam small batch bunch - Knob Creek, Baker's, Bookers (I prefer Baker's the best of these) - all have a similar profile.
Wild Turkey 101 is a classic too, with good reason.
Good luck  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RickVW Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2017 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was always a Scotch drinker up until around 18 months ago when I started buying a few bourbons and I know love the stuff.
Some of my personal favorites have been:
Michters 10
Smooth Ambler Old Scout 10
Wild Turkey Rare Breed
Rebel Yell 10
Old Weller Antique |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Desafinado Member

Joined: 03 Jan 2016 Posts: 10 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2017 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why confine yourself to one or the other? Might as well get a collection from any region you can..
I've tried a significant number of bourbons now and am moving away from them, if anything. Not a lot of pleasant character, not a lot of variation.
The positive of them is mainly the price-point and that you can down *a lot* of whisky for cheap. Bourbon is to Scotch as a domestic beer is to a Trappist version. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lincoln imp Master Of Malts

Joined: 23 Dec 2007 Posts: 751 Location: Lincolnshire England
|
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have tried bourbon quite a few times but I just cannot get into it. I drinks malts and blends but bourbon does just not do it for me.
I did like an Old Joe 4 year and a couple of others bit-u its not as enjoyable to me,it does not suit me there is very often a metallic like taste which I do not like.
It is hard to compare malts to bourbon you have to remeber generally bourbon is much younger, is a straight comparison generally really fair?
Lets face it, if you look at most of the new NAS single malts they are pretty rubbish so when you look at it like that, bourbon per age of the product may actually be better in real terms and quality/price ratio? _________________ Pour me a glass please. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Darwin Double Malt Member


Joined: 12 Mar 2015 Posts: 135 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lincoln imp wrote: | ...
It is hard to compare malts to bourbon you have to remeber generally bourbon is much younger, is a straight comparison generally really fair?
... |
It's really pointless to compare them to each other. Two totally different animals. I prefer single malts, but for variety and price points I have learned to appreciate good bourbon. It all comes down to my mood and time of year as to which one I go to.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ihasadram Double Malt Member

Joined: 13 Aug 2014 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2018 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I recently got into Bourbon. There is a post in a section about American whiskey on this forum that recommends some Bourbons for scotch lovers, and that suggests that scotch lovers tend to like Bourbons that have more rye in the mashbill. I discovered that I am sensitive to rye, and drinking a significant amount of a rye whiskey made me ill for more than a week.
In small amounts, I still enjoy Eagle Rare and, at a lower price point, Basil Hayden. I like a bit of water in the Basil Hayden, but not Eagle Rare. I want to try Buffalo Trace, which was recommended to me based on my preference for Eagle Rare. I found that I prefer the wild Turkey 81 over the 101, and I still add water to the 81.
As far as Bourbon being younger than scotch, the climate in Kentucky results in many more hot and cold cycles over time, which is recognized as effectively aging the whiskey more rapidly. A lot of Bourbon lovers shy away from the Bourbons that are aged longer than 8 years. I like them a little older, but not much. I'd put Eagle Rare up against many unpeated scotches that have 15-18 year age declarations, but it has a price to match. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|